Archives

All posts by info@laborcoalition.org

An important action alert from ACLC Co-Chair Marilyn Eisenberg:

Dear Labor Coalition Friends,

There is so much brewing on our national stage that needs our attention and, I know, many of us have been very active in letting our voices be heard. I hesitate to add to the clatter.

But right now there is a special emergency that does not have top billing in news shows, but which needs your attention immediately. Aside from repealing the Affordable Care Act and making a mess of that, Republicans have their eye on another prize, the phasing out of Medicare and Social Security. These are two programs that we have paid into for years, and with small adjustments are very sturdy financially. And so many of us do value them so.

Unfortunately, Trump has nominated two leaders who are committed to destroying both these programs. One is Mick Mulvaney for White House Budget Director. The other is Tom Price to lead the Health and Human Services administration.

At some point, we need to oppose the inevitable Congressional initiatives to take away the health care and security of our elderly. But Trump’s confirmations will be taking place very shortly.

Could you all please take just a few minutes and call 1-202-224-3121? This number will put you in touch with both Senator Rubio and Senator Nelson’s offices. Please tell them to deny the confirmation of both these men, MICK MULVANEY and TOM PRICE.

We will keep you informed about further initiatives. Mary Savage wrote an excellent article in the January Iguana, fleshing out many details. But for now, make these phone calls and send this information on to your friends who value Medicare.

While the ACLC does not endorse candidates, we do poll them to learn where they stand on issues that are important to our members. In December we began sending out questions regarding issues we care about to candidates for the Gainesville City Commission.  Below are the responses that we’ve received thus far. We strongly encourage Labor Coalition members to familiarize themselves with the various candidates for office and to get involved in their campaigns.  The election will take place March 14, 2017.

 

1) What are the biggest issues facing working people in the City of Gainesville?
Helen Warren (at-large): Our city is not much different than most cities in the world. We actually have it much better than the rural areas around Gainesville. The issue is bigger with the number of non working people who need steady income. The majority of working people are doing fine. I realize that your concern is with underpaid workers, not all workers. One problem with non-working people relates to the concentration of non-working people in neighborhoods and a culture of poverty that distracts the individual from getting the education that will provide the foundation for healthy work habits. A possible solution may be effective with an effort to change the housing patterns that continue to perpetuate poverty.
Jenn Powell (at-large): The biggest issues facing working people in the city are stagnant wages coupled with rising utility and housing costs.  Also lack of efficient public transportation to those who need it.
Craig Carter (District 3): One of the biggest issues facing working people in Gainesville is the amount of quality jobs versus the number of people in the job market. In addition to our permanent residents, we attract graduation UF/SFC students to our job market so we need, not just more jobs but a bigger diversity of jobs available for those applicants.
David Arreola (District 3): Working people in Gainesville are facing several issues, depending on their unique individual situations. Many working people in Gainesville are working below a Living Wage and therefore are living paycheck to paycheck while trying to live a normal daily life. Some working people are underemployed and are working for wages far less than their qualifications deserve, resulting in economic stagnation for college degree holders and blue-collar professionals. The City Commission must work to bring more middle class jobs to Gainesville. Finally, working people are still dealing with the effects of a rigged economy on a national scale that continues to ignore rising prices and stagnant wages while profits go up, costs go down, and employee benefits are cut. The Gainesville City Commission must acknowledge these facts.
Sheryl Eddie (District 2): A. Wage disparity  B. Accessible affordable and convenient transportation  C. Affordable housing and quality affordable childcare
Harvey Ward (District 2): “Working people” is a broad category of citizens, with a broad set of challenges. Poverty, however, affects all of us in one way or another. By working to provide a higher institutional wage floor, greater affordable housing opportunities and better transportation access, we can help raise a high percentage of our fellow citizens out of poverty. Which raises living conditions for all of us.  We also should work to invite more citizens into the process of governing by making city elections more accessible, and should work to expand fair, robust and affordable access to broadband internet service.
2) Do you support paying a living wage for all city workers? Do you believe part time, temporary, seasonal, and contracted workers should be paid a living wage?  What is your plan to get us there?  If you support extending the living wage to contracted workers, how will you ensure that these workers are being paid the set wage?
Helen Warren (at-large): Yes.  The city has been working to provide solid benefits and competitive wages to maintain a stable work place. I believe that the city recognizes that there is a savings to any operation with reduced turnover.  The current software is outdated and not capable of tracking many basic statistics. Plans are in place to upgrade the software and I am told that it will be able to track answers to many questions. I believe that this concern would be something to ask the auditor how wages could be tracked.
Jenn Powell (at-large): I support a living wage for ALL city workers.  Every worker, if employed with the city in any capacity, temporary, seasonal and contracted workers should be paid a living wage.   Enforcement may need to come in different forms but I feel we could collaborate with other state agencies to track enforcement and provide a way for employees to report violations.
Craig Carter (District 3):  I made the motion for $12.25/hour to be the floor for all our employees. While I still believe that a “living wage” applies to those working a 40-hour work week, I do believe that higher wages will bring more productive and satisfied employees.
David Arreola (District 3): I absolutely support a Living wage for all city workers. All employees should be paid a Living Wage regardless of how many hours they work a week – not everyone is able to work a 40 hour work week for various reasons outside of their control. I’m proud of the City Commission for moving the wage floor to $12.25, but there is lots of work still to be done and we need full-time champions of this issue not commissioners that will vote for it when it is politically convenient. I plan to join fellow commissioners in working to increase this wage over a period of time that will also include cost of living adjustments. In regards to contracted workers, the City will have to establish oversight to hold contractors accountable. Contracted employees must be able to submit complaints if they have not received their Living Wage.
Sheryl Eddie (District 2): Yes.  On the 15 of December 2016, the City Commission approved the living wage for all employees. Next step is ensuring that the COLA increases are implemented every year and that during budgeting each fiscal year that wage increases are a priority.  We begin with requesting entities whom receive grants and/or sponsorships from the city, disclose wage structure so it can be included in the evaluation of the proposal. This needs to be included in the request for proposal and be known that companies that pay a living wage will be given preference.  We implement the same program with all companies that do business with the city. I believe we must start with requiring disclosure of wages. Then, utilize the wage structure of a company as a part of the criteria that is scored.  The third step is instructing the purchasing department to consider a company’s wage structure as an important scoring element when evaluating companies/agencies. This is an award based system for employers that believe in a living wage.  As far as direct contract workers filling positions through a temp agency; we are in control of the wage. We require that all workers that fill positions for the city be paid at or above our standard for a living wage. That will raise cost to the city, however, the city has the ability to phase this in and to begin budgeting for the increases. Long term temps we hire directly will be paid a living wage, this has already been approved. These other temporary employees should only be utilized in emergency situations.
Harvey Ward (District 2):  I absolutely support paying city workers a living wage. My basic principle on this is that I don’t want my taxes used to pay unfair wages. I am thrilled that the current city commission has set a wage floor at $12.25 for all city employees, but there remains work to be done: First, $12.25 should not be the final wage floor, but rather a stepping stone to a true living wage closer to $15/hour. Second, that wage should extend to contract employees as well. Failing to do so raises the temptation to outsource positions to create savings, which is not the intent. The increased wage requirements will need to be written into existing contracts as they present for renewal – and funding sources will need to be identified within the budget. Simultaneously, effective (but not onerous) reporting mechanisms will need to be written into the contracts.
3) What other ideas do you have to help improve wages and benefits for workers throughout our community?
Helen Warren (at-large): We need a better education system that can get people trained for higher paying positions.  Self employment opportunities might provide more independence but individuals need to find ways to connect with people who will pay for their labor.  For example: House cleaning can provide good salary but getting enough customer takes time to build the business.  More jobs are needed attention to vocational skills.
Jenn Powell (at-large): Education is key to solving this problem. Working together with our local trade unions apprenticeship programs and our local schools, we can equip our citizens with the skills they need to find gainful employment while providing businesses with the skilled labor they need.  A lot of employees are not offered benefits and when they are they are often unaffordable. Although this is not a city commission issue, I support working with the county to bring back Alachua County Choices Healthcare or a similar program. That program benefited not only employees, but also employers that struggle to provide healthcare benefits to their workers due to increased overhead expenses.
Craig Carter (District 3): Demand; the City needs to embrace more opportunities for businesses to come to our community and bring a variety of diverse job opportunities to this area.
David Arreola (District 3): Now that the Living Wage has been increased, we must turn our attention to addressing wage compression for city employees. This means following through on staff’s review of all city employee wages and establishing increases for employees that many of the employees that did not receive increases due to the Living Wage increase. Additionally, the City of Gainesville must lead the way in convincing our largest employers in Alachua County to follow suit (UF, SFC, and Publix). The City of Gainesville must also actively work to end gender based wage discrimination in our community.
Sheryl Eddie (District 2):  Continuing to lead by example as the commission did passing the living wage for all employees on December 15th is one step and holding the city accountable for the COLA increases. No COLA increases means no bonuses or other compensation for management. Increases should be across the board, even in hard times, and this includes GRU management. This unfortunately may take time to implement because of contracts with management, but we need to start this program of fair wages to be implemented piece by piece as soon as possible.  The city needs to launch a public relations campaign that promotes Gainesville as a city that pays fair wages AFTER we work with the Chamber and other Business of organizations that use the supposed lesser cost of living as an excuse to pay lower wages. We need to work with the chamber and educate the business community on the positive impact of fair wages. High paid employees contribute to all businesses, especially small businesses.  We also need to address things such as affordable childcare and accessible transportation to employers who have a working class who face transportation issues daily. Many, especially temporary workers cannot work as much or as often as they would like for lack of affordable quality childcare. Partnering through the Child Care Executive Partnership with the Early Learning Coalition would be a start. The CCEP has never taken hold in this area because of lack of knowledge about the program and the lack of a Children’s Services Council. We now have the council so let’s get the program growing. I have an excellent relationship with the leaders in these areas and will start on day one to make CCEP and available resource for all employers.
Harvey Ward (District 2):  One thing the city commission has already called for is a thorough wage review of all city employees. As a function of that study, we will have the opportunity to address wage equity across genders – which alone will likely result in wage increases for women workers. It is essential that the City of Gainesville pay women doing the same work as men the same wage as men.  Also, once the city and county have followed through on moving all employees and contracted workers to something approaching a living wage, the city commission should formally urge the remaining public sector employers in the community – primarily UF and SFC – to follow suit.
4) Given the increasing role of private money in even our local elections, what measures would you support locally to prevent political bribery and secret money and create citizen-funded elections?
Helen Warren (at-large):  I do not think that we could enact a policy at the local level that can resolve this issue. There are lines in the sand that do not hide one’s personal integrity. I just do not see the opportunity for one’s vote to be bought at the city or county level.
Jenn Powell (at-large): I feel this is one of the biggest issues facing our democracy today.  I feel strongly that Citizens United was a giant step back for our country.  I would fully support a local Anti-Corruption Act.  We have already seen other cities take this step forward, including our state’s capital.  We can increase the public’s confidence in our local government if we remove any appearance of any official being “bought”.
Craig Carter (District 3): As a person who cannot be influenced or bribed, I am unable to answer this question.  My loyalty has always been and will continue to be with the City of Gainesville citizens. I have not been in this type of situation.
David Arreola (District 3): The overbearing influence of money in our elections has long been a concern of mine. I do not believe anybody – or entity – should be allowed to expend or contribute unlimited finances on campaign or political action committees. I would like to join with fellow commissioners in considering a version of the Anti-Corruption Act which has been passed in several US cities that focuses on transparency. Citizens deserve to know if elected officials are making favorable decisions and actions for their largest campaign contributors. Citizen-funded elections might be impossible until unlimited spending is dealt with at the federal and state level by reversing Citizens United. However, the greatest tool we have is the technology to make candidate information, contributor information, and the records of elected officials accessible to voters. On the City Commission I will publish my votes and explain why I voted this way. This I believe is an important step all elected officials should consider making.
Sheryl Eddie (District 2):  First, I wish we had the power to reverse Citizen’s United, but we do not; locally, there is way too much finger pointing. There are “cliques” in the parties that try to organize and donate to candidates though not always via a PAC. The cost of a local election has grown out of control; 35k for City Commission single district. This needs to be addressed.  Legally we are limited. I believe we should start by utilizing what we can control.  For example, GRU sends out a newsletter and we should allow all candidates a spot for a small advertisement; same size, free for each candidate. We need to plan for the election cycle each time. Same with time at televised city commission meetings. All candidates should be able to give a three minute speech on a particular time and it should be streamed on the City’s websites as meetings are, and on social media.  This will not stop the influx of dollars; however, it will give all candidates an ability to be heard by the voters who want to tune in. This type of exposure will be available to all candidates, even the less financially backed. With the limit on elections of a $250 donation, we do have some control. From personal experience $10/20/30 dollar donations are easier to get and add up fast.  We could look into instituting a cap on funds as well; one year’s salary for local elections. That could help control cost before they expand even more.  As the wife of a former labor union VP, I understand the critical role labor organizations play in our society, a role that has dimensioned over the years. I also understand the art of negotiation. I am a voice needed on the commission.
Harvey Ward (District 2):  First I should say that I do not accept PAC or business funding for my campaign. The only dollars that fund my campaign are from living, breathing humans – more than 180 of them at this point. I am interested in citizen funded elections. As a community we might investigate initiatives such as the anti-corruption act passed in Tallahassee in 2014.  A thing that we could encourage locally and immediately is broader public access to candidates and campaigns. By the time this campaign is finished, I and the other candidates for city office will have completed dozens of questionnaires like this one and will have appeared in at least half a dozen fora. Most voters will have had no access to nor awareness of any of the questionnaires or fora. Perhaps the city, in partnership with the Supervisor of Elections, local public media, and all the organizations that organize these questionnaires and fora, could make these documents and recordings of the fora widely publicly available. Otherwise I would venture to say that fewer than 500 voters – and perhaps as low as 250 – will ever read or hear anything from the questionnaires and fora. Which means candidates will continue to raise and spend tens of thousands of dollars to get their message to voters in a never-ending cycle that prevents clear discussion of issues and policies.

In November, Alachua County voters will decide on “Alachua County Question #1.”  If approved, the measure would continue the current one mill ad valorem tax for four more years.  The tax will result in an additional $11-13 million for our schools each year to fund “school nurses, elementary music and art programs, K-12 school library programs, K-12 guidance programs, middle and high school band and chorus programs, academic/ career technical magnet programs and to update classroom technology.”

The Alachua County Labor Coalition has invited Jackie Johnson from the School Board to explain why we should support this initiative.  But we also want to hear from critics and people who have concerns about the One Mill, and have invited Nkwanda Jah from the Cultural Arts Coalition to speak as well.  This forum will allow attendees to hear multiple perspectives and will also provide an opportunity to ask questions of the speakers.

Join us on Tuesday, Oct. 25th at the Alachua County Health Department (224 SE 24th St.).  Pizza and drinks will be available starting at 6pm, and the forum will get underway promptly at 6:30pm.  Please be sure to invite your friends.

 

Speaker bio:

Jackie Johnson currently serves as Director of Communications and Community Initiatives for Alachua County Public Schools. She has been communicating about public education for nearly 25 years, both as a school system employee and as a television reporter. She is a graduate of the University of Florida College of Journalism and worked as an education reporter, anchor and assignment editor at WCJB-TV 20 before moving on to UF’s Health Science Center. Since 1992, she’s managed communications and public relations for both Alachua County Public Schools and the Orange County Public Schools in Orlando. She has won several awards for her work, including her coordination of successful ballot initiatives on behalf of both districts.

In the community, Jackie is a member of the board of directors for both the United Way of North Central Florida and the Education Foundation of Alachua County Public Schools. She also served five years as public relations chair for the Rotary Club of Gainesville and two terms as the president of the Sunshine State School Public Relations Association.

Jackie’s husband Mark is Director of Development and Public Relations for the Arc of Alachua County, a non-profit organization which serves adults with intellectual disabilities. Her daughter is a GHS graduate and is currently in nursing school, and her five year old grandson just started kindergarten at Norton Elementary School.

 

Nkwanda Jah has served as Executive Director for 38 years and is  one of the Founders of the Cultural Arts Coalition (CAC). She serves on several boards including Resilience Charter School, Lake Forest Elem school SAC, past SAC member at Williams and Duval Elem schools, Past Chair and member of Head Start Council.  CAC presently has 10 Science Clubs in East Gainesville for K thru 5th grade. Nkwanda is a Board member of Three Rivers Legal Services.  She is also a mother/grandmother and great grandmother.

You can RSVP for the event here.

Here’s a map to the event.

As many of you know, the Labor Coalition occupied our former office space on University Ave. for more than a decade.  When we vacated the property earlier this year, we had an unfortunate encounter with Nautilus Realty and were forced to seek legal aid.  Ironically, an ACLC supporter had alerted us months prior that tenant abuse is rampant in Gainesville and we had already been in discussion with staff at Three Rivers Legal Services about a presentation on tenant issues for our September membership meeting.  Gainesville is a community where close to half of all residents are renters.  The encounter with Nautilus drove home for us how many low-income renters have few legal protections against the unjust and sometimes illegal actions of their landlords and we are interested in learning more about this issue.

Our friends at Three Rivers Legal Services often work with renters and have agreed to tell us more about their work in this area.  Please join the Labor Coalition on for a presentation by Three Rivers’ LaKesha Thomas on Tuesday, Sept. 27th, 6:30pm at the Emmanuel Mennonite Church (1236 NW 18th Ave.).  The presentation will get under way at 6:30pm, but pizza, drinks, and fellowship will be available starting at 6pm.  Please RSVP for the event here on Facebook.

A short bio of LaKesha Thomas:

Ms. Thomas is a native of Gainesville, FL, born and raised right here in Alachua County.  She attended Duval Elementary School, Howard Bishop Middle School and Gainesville High School, where she was the c/o 2000 class president.
She is no stranger to the difficulties facing the working class. She grew up with her family members in public and low income housing. Her goal became to become the 1st in her family to graduate from college. She achieved this goal in 2005, graduating from the University of Central Florida (UCF), in Orlando, in the top 12% of her class. She went on to graduate from FAMU College of Law and returned to Gainesville where she graduated from the UF LLM Tax Program in 2012.

Ms. Thomas is currently a staff attorney with Three Rivers Legal Services. Her sheer joy is volunteering with children and empowering her community through legal advocacy. She believes in reaching for the stars, because this way we will never stop growing, learning, and achieving our dreams.

Please join us for this month’s membership meeting. We’ll have updates on our Living Wage and Just Health Care campaigns. Our new intern, Wallace Mazon, will offer a short presentation on Medicaid Expansion in FL, and we’ll also hear a report-back from locals who attended the Democratic National Convention and People’s Summit in Philadelphia.

The meeting will start at 6:30pm but pizza and drinks will be available starting at 6pm. The meeting will be held at the Emmanuel Mennonite Church (1236 NW 18th Ave., Gainesville). Be sure to invite a friend!

HC human right

Please join the Alachua County Labor Coalition Tuesday, July 26th at 6:30 pm to listen to and ask questions of a panel of state and federal candidates running for elected office about their views of Health Care Issues, including single payer health care and Medicaid expansion in Florida.

 

Every year in July, the Alachua County Labor Coalition (ACLC) joins organizations around the country to celebrate the birthday of Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is the culmination of a decades-long debate about universal health coverage for all, and is the largest single program to improve national access to health coverage and services. Before its passage in 1965, 44% of those age 65 and older were uninsured.

 

The ACLC has advocated for a single-payer health care system for over 20 years, along with advocating for other working class issues such as a Living Wage for all. The ACLC has also been working with a coalition of over a hundred groups across Florida to expand Medicaid in Florida.

 

We have confirmations of attendance from Rod Smith, candidate for State Senate district 8; Marihelen Wheeler, candidate for FL House 21; Tom Wells, candidate Congressional District 3; and a representative from Alan Grayson’s campaign, U.S. Senate candidate. Other invited candidates include Ken McGurn, Keith Perry, and Congressman Ted Yoho.

 

Chad Hood, a doctor at the Gainesville VA and Health Care Liaison for the ACLC will moderate. Scott Darius, Advocacy Director of Florida Chain, a state-wide organization that promotes expanding Medicaid coverage in Florida, will also be at the forum to field questions.

 

Food and beverages will be served at 6pm at the Mennonite Church at 1236 NW 18th Ave. Panel follows at 6:30 PM, ending with a birthday cake for Medicare and Medicaid. For more information call 352-375-2832. Free and open to the public–please be sure to invite your friends! 

While the ACLC does not endorse candidates, we do poll them to learn where they stand on issues that are important to our members. In May we began sending out questions regarding the Living Wage and access to health care to candidates at the local and state level. Below are the responses that we’ve received thus far. Needless to say, this election cycle will be an extremely important one for our community, our state, and our nation. We strongly encourage Labor Coalition members to familiarize themselves with the various candidates for office and to get involved in their campaigns.

Tom Wells is the only candidate for federal office who has replied to our Candidate Questionnaire:

1. Do you support increasing the federal minimum wage? If so,what wage do you think this should be?

I agree with Bernie Sanders that the minimum wage should be increased to $15.  I argue that it should in fact be higher (e.g. consonant with productivity increases referenced to the 1960’s), that it should be increased post haste – not over a span of years, that it should apply to all workers (domestics, tipped wait staff, farm workers), and – once escalation to a just wage is accomplished – that it be indexed to CPI.  My father taught me that honest labor, in any capacity, deserved respect.  A living wage is the minimal measure of respect.  To those now making $15, or any wage in excess of the present minimum; be not dismayed. You have earned that.  And your wage justly should be increased in proportion.  If you were making 2 times the minimum, you should continue to do so – but this will never be a matter of law.  You have 2 choices:  You can ask your boss – it might happen.  You can organize & negotiate with your boss.  That’s called a union.  We are all members of a magnificent union: the United States.  We decide collectively what min wage honors the social contract – a process that has been abrogated as moneyed interests have for 35+ years corrupted Congress.

2. Do you support bringing the United States in line with nearly all of the rest of the industrialized world by replacing the Affordable Care Act with a publicly financed national health program, also known as “Medicare for All”?  Would you support legislation that would make health care affordable and accessible to all by joining the 62 other representatives that have signed on as co-sponsors to H.R. 676?

I have long espoused universal health care – health care as a human right; as has Bernie Sanders; as did the Democratic Party prior to the Clintons & I support any rational move in that direction.  Specifically I will support H.R. 676 until/unless I am convinced that a better option has been crafted.

It is my expectation that these 2 matters will yield dramatic bottom-up expansion of the economy, dramatically reduce poverty – and the welfare budget, and bring U.S. health care outcomes into line with the results of countries where these are givens.

While the ACLC does not endorse candidates, we do poll them to learn where they stand on issues that are important to our members. In May we began sending out questions regarding the Living Wage and access to health care to candidates at the local and state level. Below are the responses that we’ve received thus far. Needless to say, this election cycle will be an extremely important one for our community, our state, and our nation. We strongly encourage Labor Coalition members to familiarize themselves with the various candidates for office and to get involved in their campaigns.

 

At the state level, we’ve heard back from two candidates on a range of issues, including the Living Wage, home rule, and statewide Medicaid expansion:

1. Do you support increasing the Florida minimum wage, currently at $8.05 an hour, to a living wage? If so, what amount do you think this should be?

*Clovis Watson: “I am strong supporter of raising of the minimum wage. I have co-sponsored legislation to increase the minimum wage and have participated in the minimum wage challenge. No one should work a full-time job and in some cases 2 jobs and qualify for public assistance. As we move forward, I will continue to fight for the increase to a living wage.”

*Marihelen Wheeler: “Yes, I do support a living wage and feel we should follow the lead of those who are raising to $15.00 an hour.”

2. Do you support or oppose local initiatives that benefit working families such as: family sick leave requirements, wage recovery ordinances, living wage ordinances, and project-labor agreements?

*Clovis Watson: “As a former city manager, I have always championed home rule authority. With that being said, I am in support of communities who have taken it upon themselves to enact local initiatives to better their communities and working families. My voting record is reflection of this position.”

*Marihelen Wheeler: “I support local initiatives that benefit working families as outlined in this question. It is ridiculous for a government that espouses “less government” to continue to interfere with local governance. Local initiatives are crafted to meet the needs of local people.”

3. Do you support the repeal of FL Statute 218.077 which preempts local governments from enacting a living wage that isn’t solely for their workers, their contractors, or entities receiving tax incentives?

*Clovis Watson: “Yes, I would support the repeal of this statute as I have strong record of voting against legislation that would preempt home rule authority.”

*Marihelen Wheeler: “I do support the repeal of FL Statute 218.077 which restricts local governments from decision making that is best for the community they serve.”

4. Do you support Medicaid expansion so that almost 600,000 Florida residents, the majority of whom are in working families, can get health care at less than 10 percent of the cost to the Florida taxpayers?

*Clovis Watson: “I have been a strong supporter of Medicaid expansion since my election to the Florida House. I have not only debated and voted in favor of Medicaid expansion but have also stood with my colleagues in procedural moves to force the conversation and put pressure on the Legislature to expand healthcare. I will continue to fight for the expansion healthcare for all Floridian who may find themselves in need.”

*Marihelen Wheeler: “I do support Medicaid expansion to the extent that universal health care becomes the ultimate goal.”

While the ACLC does not endorse candidates, we do poll them to learn where they stand on issues that are important to our members. In May we began sending out questions regarding the Living Wage and access to health care to candidates at the local and state level. Below are the responses that we’ve received thus far. Needless to say, this election cycle will be an extremely important one for our community, our state, and our nation. We strongly encourage Labor Coalition members to familiarize themselves with the various candidates for office and to get involved in their campaigns.

 

The Alachua County School Board is another of our community’s largest employers, with many workers still making below a Living Wage. Here’s what our candidates for School Board had to say on this topic:

1. Do you support paying all Alachua County School Board workers a living wage? This includes part-time, full-time, instructional, ESP, temporary, and contracted workers.

*Juliun Kinsey: “Yes, anyone who is responsible for the safety and well-being of children deserves to be paid no less than a living wage. This issue is personal for me and will be a priority if I am elected. My mother is a paraprofessional currently earning $10.89 an hour. She has two other jobs to supplement the school board’s failure to offer a living wage.”

*Leanetta McNealy: “I would be in support of paying Alachua County School Board workers in a responsible way. We are currently working toward increasing our employees salaries which also includes one of the best benefit packages in the state which the Board pays an additional $3.00 per employee.”

*Eileen Roy: “Yes. The Alachua County School Board already pays all workers who work half-time or more benefits, including retirement and 100% of health care premium. For full-time employees, these benefits total $3.05/ hour and for half-time or more, they total even more—up to $5 hour.”

2. Do you support a phase-in over the next 5 years to increase the Alachua School Board’s minimum wage to 125% the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), currently at $14.60 an hour?

*Juliun Kinsey: “Yes, the total amount of the annual budget is more than $333 million. Surely the Alachua County School Board can (and should) phase-in this appropriate minimum wage increase.”

*Leanetta McNealy: “I would want to pursue our increases in a responsible way. The equity between job classifications such as ESP’s, instructional, and administrators, would create a significant impact on our budget. It would be wonderful to be able to do this, but given the significant financial impact to the District it would require a substantial increase in funding from the State.”

*Eileen Roy: “Yes, especially if one includes benefits.  The lowest paid  school board employee presently makes about $10.00/hr.  Benefits for full-time equal $3 more, so we should be able to reach this goal if benefits are counted.   It is always my goal.  Bear in mind that the School Board cannot raise our millage like the city or the county.  Our millage is set by the state, so we have limited control.”

 

While the ACLC does not endorse candidates, we do poll them to learn where they stand on issues that are important to our members. In May we began sending out questions regarding the Living Wage and access to health care to candidates at the local and state level. Below are the responses that we’ve received thus far. Needless to say, this election cycle will be an extremely important one for our community, our state, and our nation. We strongly encourage Labor Coalition members to familiarize themselves with the various candidates for office and to get involved in their campaigns.

 

We asked candidates for County Commission where they stand on our recent Living Wage victory and there was more or less consensus:

1. Do you support the 2016 Alachua County Minimum Wage Ordinance which set a standard wage for contracted employees?

*Mike Byerly: “I support it, and voted for it.”

*Chloe Goldbach: “Loopholes that allow contract employees of the county to paid less than minimum for county employees should not have existed in the first place so I therefore definitely support the minimum wage ordinance.”

*Captain Craig Herda: “I have yet to read the Ordinance, therefore I would not be able to comment at this time.”

*Robert “Hutch” Hutchinson: “YES, I encouraged the ordinance and voted for its passage. Furthermore, I am continuing to advocate for changes to compensation formulas that will reduce the widening gap between the top and bottom earners.”

*Kevin Thorpe: “ABSOLUTELY.”

2. Do you support paying all Alachua County Commission workers a living wage? This includes part-time, full-time, temporary, and contracted workers.

*Mike Byerly: “I support it, worked to weed out undermining exemptions, then voted for it.”

*Chloe Goldbach: “Yes, I do support paying all Alachua County Commission workers a living wage providing that this does not stop here and plans are put in place to eventually expand this towards paying living wages in the private sector as well. Everyone in the county should have access to a living wage.”

*Captain Craig Herda: “Yes, I do support paying workers for work done.  Everyone in this country needs to receive a “living wage”. However, I am also a proponent of Government representatives, if they already are financially secure, to serve their government without renumeration.  It should be a honor to perform your civic duty.”

*Robert “Hutch” Hutchinson: “YES, except for the very few exemptions which were made for valid reasons by the majority of the County Commission. We have a serious obstacle in raising all non-profit contractors to the Living Wage, but we must try.”

*Kevin Thorpe: “ABSOLUTELY.”

3. Do you support a phase-in to increase the County government’s minimum wage to 125% the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) by 2020, currently at $14.60 an hour?

*Mike Byerly: “I do support that goal, and will work towards it.”

*Chloe Goldbach: “Yes, I support this.”

*Captain Craig Herda: “Yes. We need to come in line with the Federal Guidelines for wages. And expanding on that, the wages need to be enough to sustain a living. But of course, no one should get “rich” off the government.”

*Robert “Hutch” Hutchinson: “YES, and the expensive part of this is not the cost of raising the lowest workers’ wages. Rather, it is dealing with the ripple effect of “wage compression” up the ranks.  Union leaders need to be part of the solution to this.”

*Kevin Thorpe: “ABSOLUTELY.”